IAW METHODOLOGY

IAW Conflict Severity Index (CSI)

A proprietary indicator from International Affairs Watch to measure the severity of armed conflicts based on five dimensions: military intensity, civilian impact, escalation risk, humanitarian access, and internationalization.

Reading example

Gaza 2024

78/100Crítico
0255075100
Window: 7 days
Updated: 2026-01-15

How to interpret the CSI

The index is divided into four severity bands according to the total score obtained.

0-24
Low

Limited or sporadic violence. Restricted civilian impact. Contained escalation risk.

25-49
Medium

Sustained tension with regular violent episodes. Moderate humanitarian impact. Escalation risk present.

50-74
High

High violence or significant humanitarian deterioration. Restrictions on humanitarian access. Elevated escalation risk.

75-100
Critical

High lethality, severe humanitarian crisis, or probable escalation. Requires urgent international attention.

Important note: The CSI measures the severity of conflict over time. It does not measure 'legitimacy,' 'culpability,' or 'moral value' of the actors involved.

CSI of Monitored Conflicts

Updated severity index for all conflicts under IAW monitoring

No conflicts with published CSI yet. Scores will appear here when available.

View global monitor

The 5 Dimensions of CSI

Each dimension contributes up to 20 points to the total score, evaluating specific aspects of the conflict situation.

Military Intensity (0-20)

Frequency and intensity of hostilities (operations, attacks, clashes).

Typical signals: Attack peaks, use of heavy weaponry, geographic expansion of operations.

Civilian Impact (0-20)

Direct harm to civilian population and effects on daily life.

Typical signals: Mass displacement, increased civilian casualties, collapse of essential services.

Escalation Risk (0-20)

Probability of conflict intensification in the short term.

Typical signals: Regional mobilization, credible threats, breakdown of negotiations, border incidents.

Humanitarian Access (0-20)

Restrictions and actual capacity for assistance (food, health, safe corridors).

Typical signals: Blockades, attacks on civilian infrastructure, restrictions on aid entry.

Internationalization (0-20)

Level of participation or involvement of external actors (military, financial, diplomatic).

Typical signals: Direct intervention, proxy support, international sanctions, military coalitions.

Visualization by Dimension

Military Intensity16/20
Civilian Impact18/20
Escalation Risk15/20
Humanitarian Access14/20
Internationalization15/20
Total CSI
78/100Crítico

Calculation Methodology

Calculation steps

1

A score of 0 to 20 is assigned for each of the five dimensions.

2

The five partial scores are summed.

3

The total result (0-100) determines the severity band.

Formula
CSI = M + C + E + H + I
M = Military Intensity (0-20)
C = Civilian Impact (0-20)
E = Escalation Risk (0-20)
H = Humanitarian Access (0-20)
I = Internationalization (0-20)

Update Frequency

The CSI is recalculated periodically using two time windows to capture both peaks and sustained trends.

Short term
Last 7 days

Captures activity peaks and abrupt changes in the situation.

Trend
Last 30 days

Smooths volatility and shows the general trend of the conflict.

Reading Example

Gaza 2024

Window: 7 días • Updated: 2026-01-15
78/100Crítico

El CSI se ubica en "Crítico" principalmente por alto impacto civil y restricciones humanitarias. El riesgo de escalada permanece elevado por participación de actores externos y deterioro diplomático.

Highest dimension: Civilian impact and humanitarian restrictions significantly raise the score.

Contained dimension: Military intensity remains at medium levels without recent territorial expansion.

Alert factors: Internationalization and escalation risk keep the conflict in critical zone.

Limitations and Scope

Open sources: The CSI is based on public and verifiable information. There may be underreporting in hard-to-access areas.

Temporal delay: Data may present delays depending on the availability of official reports and source verification.

Monitoring tool: The index is an analytical tool, not a political, legal, or moral verdict on the conflict.

Context needed: The score should be interpreted alongside qualitative analysis and historical context.

The CSI is a constantly evolving tool. International Affairs Watch adjusts the methodology based on feedback and developments in the field of conflict analysis.

How to Cite the CSI

If you use the IAW Conflict Severity Index in your work, you can cite it using the following formats:

Standard format
International Affairs Watch (IAW), Conflict Severity Index (CSI), [Conflict Name], [Date], [Score].
Example: International Affairs Watch (IAW), Conflict Severity Index (CSI), Gaza 2024, January 15, 2026, 78.
APA 7th
International Affairs Watch. (2026). Conflict Severity Index (CSI): [Conflict]. https://internationalaffairswatch.org/csi
BibTeX
@misc{iaw_csi_2026, author = {{International Affairs Watch}}, title = {Conflict Severity Index (CSI): [Conflict]}, year = {2026}, url = {https://internationalaffairswatch.org/csi}, note = {Accessed: YYYY-MM-DD} }

Institutional or academic use: If you need to cite the CSI in academic publications, institutional reports, or media, you can contact us for additional information about the methodology.

Contact